• Home
  • Intro
  • T-Codes
  • Other Blogs
  • SCM Book
  • Consulting
  • Author

SAP SCM Planning

Explanation and Configuration Details of SAP APO / SCM

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Assemble to Order and Dell and Apple

July 4, 2009 by sapplanningadmin

Dell

Assemble to Order in SAP SCM

Assemble to order is a functionality available in SAP SCM. This functionality is incorporated in PP/DS as well as GATP. PP/DS must plan and schedule the production, while GATP – if employed – uses Multi-Level ATP in order to effectively inter-operate with PP/DS in order to provide an available to promise quantity back to either SD or to CRM.

When Assemble to Order is Appropriate

The assemble to order manufacturing method is appropriate for situations where a large number of sub-assemblies can be put together quickly to create a final product. The best example of this is the computer industry. Once the basic components (computer shell, hard drive, mother board, memory, fans, display, video card, battery, power supply) are available in one location, the final assembly of a laptop, stand alone or server is simple. The earliest personal computers were actually kits, and of course early mainframes were assemble to order – made in a job shop environment. However, once computers became mass produced, they moved towards a make to stock environment. This persisted until an upstart used the Internet to take orders for a make to order computer.

Assemble to Order at Dell

The assemble to order model was made famous by Dell, and coincided with the development of the Internet as a sales medium.

Dell pioneered the assemble to order model and pushed inventory back on its suppliers, so it received payment for the hardware before it paid for the parts. I suspect that Dell’s pressure on its suppliers and its choice to remain very loyal to Intel has cost it as well, as suppliers will only extend so much effort to mollify a customer that constantly beats down on price.

______________________________

Does Assemble to Order Provide Long Term Advantage?

Dell was at one point a leader and picked up rapid market share, but their assembly to order model and online business model as not provided the longer term advantage Dell hoped to maintain. By 2007, Dell had stalled and its once best in class quality and customer service had dropped. In order to increase sales, Dell actually moved to add a retail side to their business which has been attributed by analysts as improving the company’s outlook. However, selling computers in a retail store is a build to stock manufacturing model, not an assembly to order. Article after article talked about how Dell’s big advantage was build to order generally, and assembly to order more specifically. The people writing these articles, by in large did not have a manufacturing background, and our inkling is that they oversold the benefits of assemble to order. Assemble to order is good, but a lot of computer buyers buy standardized computers, and thus build to stock is fine for a large segment of the market. Dell builds gaming machines as well, and for this market, build to order is a better fit.

Now most computer builders both an assembly to order and a build to stock model working side by side.

Apple

Apple has a very nice configuration site that when complete creates an assemble to order order which is sent to the company’s overseas manufacturing arm. We are not sure, but think its likely that the item is shipped directly from the overseas factory to the customer site. However, you can also buy a made to stock Mac from an Apple store. This is how almost all computer manufacturers work now, except for specialised companies that build gaming boxes that only assemble to order, and servers, which are also primarily assemble to order.

What we are waiting for is when automobile manufacturers become capable of doing build to order. This is because the auto industry holds far too much finished goods inventory. Currently, automobile manufacturers have a large oversupply of many vehicles.

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/daily-news/090415-GM-Has-Massive-Oversupply-of-Pontiac-G3/

This brings up the entire topic of the auto dealer model, which was developed before the Internet and seems increasingly wasteful and unnecessary. See this post for more details.

http://spplan.wordpress.com/2009/05/16/auto-service-part-networks-are-a-mess/

_______________________________

It can be enabled in SAP SCM in the following modules:

GATP – Multi Level ATP. This is one of the three forms of ATP provided by GATP. To read more about this see this post.

http://sapplanning.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/gatp/

References

http://seekingalpha.com/article/36656-is-wal-mart-the-answer-to-dell-s-problems-not-likely


Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

  • Assemble to Order

Posted in GATP | 1 Comment

One Response

  1. on July 5, 2009 at 2:41 pm Showing Parts Connections Online « SPPLAN – Service Parts Planning

    [...] http://sapplanning.wordpress.com/2009/07/04/assemble-to-order-and-dell-and-apple/ [...]



Comments are closed.

  • About This Site

    This site is the on-line configuration database and SCM explanation site for the SCM work of Shaun Snapp. Over 235 of its 340 articles are open to anyone.
  • SEARCH TIP

    When using the search box place multiple terms in quotations. Typing the term you seek + "sap scm" into Google will find articles faster than this search box will. Also, the category selection and tag selection (listed below) are excellent ways to find what you are looking for.
  • Blog Stats

    • 144,516 hits
  • Categories

    APO BI CIF Cross-Module CTM CTP Definition DP EM EWM F&R GATP Implementation Issues iPPE Main Management Master Data Planning Approaches Planning Books PLM PM PPDS PPM PDS PS Reference Resources SAP ERP SAP Jobs SCM Basis SCM Introduction SNC SNP SPP T-Codes TPVS WM
  • Tags

    Amazon.com App Integration ASN ATP Categories Availability Checking Bins BOM Capture Demand Constraints Deployment Deployment Optimizer DRP EOQ Forecasting Forecast Profile Grouping - Aggregation Handling InfoCube Inventory Management Kitting Leading Indicator Forecasting Lot Size Multilevel Planning Optimization Planning Book Product Location Master PSM Quota Arrangement Repair Replenishment Safety Stock Scheduling Agreement Seasonal Planning Service Level Planning Star Schema Subcontracting Supersession Supplier Supplier Collaboration Supply Surplus Planning Transportation Lane Vehicle Scheduling WBS Work Center
  • Other Blogs

    SAP Planning is just one of my supply chain blogs. See the blogs listed below for other sites that cover various supply chain technologies.
  • RSS Service Parts Planning

    • Where Service Level is Set
    • MultiEchelon Inventory Optimization Defined
    • The Saturn Service Parts System
    • Why Is Optiant So Secretive?
    • Inventory Optimization or Service Level Planning?
  • RSS Project Systems

    • Other Blogs
    • Lock Box
    • FI AR – Post Invoice and clear payments / reports
    • Networks in PS
    • Work Breakdown Structure
  • RSS Fourth Party Logistics

    • A Good Reason Why SAP SCM Can’t Penetrate 3PLs
    • Is the Idea of Consulting Based 4PLs Believable?
    • Tendering and Freight Marketplaces
    • SAP Design for 3PL and 4PL
    • Creating a Platform for 4PL
  • RSS GPS for Supply Chain

    • How Tracking Solutions Work
    • GPS for Transportation Safety
    • IQ Routes for Transportation Efficiency
    • GPS for Supply Chain?
  • RSS Supply Chain Innovation

    • Anti Competitive Behavior in Supply Chain Software Goes Unnoticed
    • Lesson from the History of Supply Chain Software and Implementations
    • Fishbowl Inventory and Auto Reorder Point Functionality
    • Fishbowl Inventory Review: Bringing Mini-ERP to the Masses
    • Exostar and the Advantages of the SaaS Model for Collaboration
  • RSS Snapp Consulting Docs

    • SAP Publications
    • SAP Integration Docs and Diagrams
    • Service Parts Planning
    • SAP SCM MindMapper Diagrams
    • Supply Chain Process Docs
  • RSS Content Management for This Site

    • WP for Data Feed

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Mistylook by Sadish.