
Customized The Frozen Period
One of the most important considerations is the cadence of the system. Standard planning philosophy states that the minimum frozen period should be the review time plus the lead-time of the product (a difficult concept to implement since many of the products have different lead times, however a limited number of frozen periods must eventually be selected.)

Some naturally low cadence industries like aerospace and defense (A&D), can be set with long frozen periods. This is an industry marked by long lead times and long manufacturing lead times. A&D is also one of the few examples of a true make to order environment, even though many different companies claim to be make to order, which are actually assemble or package to order. However, when one moves towards faster cadence industries the question becomes what type of frozen period to accept.

For people with a significant orientation on planning, the desire can be to attempt to implement a relatively long frozen period to essentially demarcate planning from operations. The very selection of a frozen period determines whether SCM is used only for planning or for both planning and execution – at least for the planning oriented components of SCM. However, this is only one way to peel the onion.
Planning and Execution in SCM
While the official story from SAP is that SAP ERP is for execution, while SAP SCM is for planning, the actual story is more complex than that. In fact, SCM has a number of execution elements to it. SCM may never get to the point of cutting purchase orders, but a lot of it does can be classified if not executional then at least tactical. The graphic below provides a synopsis of this.

The Actual Practice of the Frozen Period
Generally a frozen period of a week or two is recommended and is considered the standard way of controlling a planning system at least according to textbooks. However, in actual fact, frozen periods are not all that commonly used in real deployments of planning software. There are several reasons for this:
- For industries with a fast cadence, perhaps the best way to meet their planning needs is to dispense with the frozen period and instead allow changes that come within lead time to be observed and reacted to by both planners and operators who each use the SCM system.
- Secondly, while “planning” systems were originally intended to be used for planning exclusively, in fact companies tend to use planning systems for operations, short term to mid term planning, and very little long term planning. In fact the most long term planning that occurs is in the S&OP process, which is a disaster area at most companies.
This brings up an extremely important point related to how planning systems are actually used in practice, which is quite a bit different from how vendors designed them to be used. One way to improve the planning systems ability to manage both operations and planning is to create differentiated alerts. The alert monitor allows alerts to be flexibly sent to different individuals that have different responsibilities.

Conclusion
Upon analysis of SAP SCM it is apparent that there are several ways of dealing with the changes that arrive within the planning system that are outside of the planning period. One way is to deal with the changes only in SAP ERP. Another is to use SAP SCM and simply control the within lead-time changes by creating alerts that a specialized group which, are more execution and expediting oriented than planning oriented, manage.