SAP has a habit of creating its own terminology when standard terminology is already accepted and in general use. I pointed this out previously with their misuse of the terms leading indicator and extended warehouse management. Both of these terms have different usage than the way that SAP uses them. Leading indicator is not even a term in supply chain. My issue with SAP terminology goes back to 1997 when I was in SAP SD training and the instructor was speaking about material determination. After 10 minutes or so I realized that SAP was referring to product substitution. I got up and addressed the class that this terminology was not correct and unnecessarily confusing.
Why Do This?
I feel like this helps out people are tying to figure out SAP SCM and may think that SAP has created a new term that is part of supply chain management, when in fact it is not. I have never been able to figure out if the misuse of terms is due to genuinely not knowing the correct term to use, or some type of obscure marketing reasons.
EOQ POD?
The latest incorrect term is the term EOQ Period. In SPP there exists two options with regards to ordering quantity for child locations. SAP offers EOQ, and what they call EOQ POD, or period. The path for this configuration is
IMG: APO –> Supply Chain Planning –> SPP –> DRP –> Make General Settings for DRP
Here you can see I have selected EOQ Period. However, the term EOQ Period is not a term in inventory management. You can look through supply chain and operations research books and not find it. I tested this by checking with Google Books.
There were only 8 hits, and they were either SAP publications or mis-hits as you can see above where EOQ and period are separated by a comma and not an actual term.
The correct term for an economic order quantity that is triggered by the passage of time rather than the hitting of a certain quantity is Periodic Order Quantity, or POQ.
















